|
|
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: stev...@bnr.ca (Steve Keppel-Jones)
Date: 1998/02/01
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
Steven B. Harris <sbhar...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: >>: > Baloney. If you eat 1000 kcal a day of pure carbohydrate while Steve You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: Barbara Cameron <bcame...@istar.ca>
Date: 1998/02/03
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
This is anecdotal but my friend is quite a bit overweight, she eats 900 You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: pbeyer <pbe...@kumc.edu>
Date: 1998/02/03
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
Barbara Cameron wrote: I believe most folks who claim to eat only 800 calories (or whatever > This is anecdotal but my friend is quite a bit overweight, she eats 900 > I had the opportunity to test a few folks who adamantly and honestly claimed they were gaining or maintaining weight on 800 calories-- They were first measured for RME resting metabolic expenditure using indirect calorimetry. Many of these folks required less than one would expect but still needed more than 800 calories just at rest. During the day they were able to select their foods from the hospital cafeteria. What the individuals chose was rarely 800 calories-- one woman chose 450 calories just for breakfast (honestly thought the link sausages were only 70 calories each) and had no clue as to the caloric content of some of the mixed salads (some were in the range of 200-230 calories when they thought they were in the range of 60-100. level) aren't dishonest, just don't have a good idea for portion sizes or understand caloric content. Many overweight individuals may need less than others of the same height/age but they are not likely to be metabolic freaks. It's tough to be on a diet and its tougher if one only gets to eat say, 1200-1400 calories wothout gaining weight. Pete MS, RD You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: sbhar...@ix.netcom.com(Steven B. Harris)
Date: 1998/02/03
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
In <6b66e6$...@news.inforamp.net> Barbara Cameron <bcame...@istar.ca> >This is anecdotal but my friend is quite a bit overweight, she eats a day and nothing else but water. She'll lose. Steve You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: suequill <suequ...@pan-tex.net>
Date: 1998/02/01
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work?
Tracey, Hi!
Zev gave some very good advice. The one thing you didn't mention is Susie You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: Tracy <Tr...@white-star.com>
Date: 1998/02/02
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work?
> Zev gave some very good advice. The one thing you didn't mention is Yes, I posted immediately following my original one that I am 5 feet, > how tall are you? > Susie 8-1/2 inches tall. You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: bl1...@aol.com (BL 1204)
Date: 1998/02/01
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
Phosphate supplementation prevents a decrease of triiodothyronine and increases ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Author: •Nazar K •Kaciuba-Usciko H •Szczepanik J •Zemba AW •Kruk B •Chwalbinska-Moneta Address: Department of Applied Physiology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Abbreviated Journal Title: J Physiol Pharmacol You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: jetsilv...@aol.com (JetsilverX)
Date: 1998/02/01
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
>Phosphate supplementation prevents a decrease of triiodothyronine and Cola drinks are a good source of phosphates. >increases >resting metabolic rate during low energy diet. Jet Silverman To email me, remove the x. (I won't buy from anyone who sends me If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people? You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: ne...@king.cts.com (Alan Pollock)
Date: 1998/02/01
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work? No.
:
:If ignorance is bliss, why aren't there more happy people? Because they don't know they are happy. Nex __________________________________________________________________________ "Ah, if in this world there were no such thing as cherry blossoms, perhaps You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
Newsgroups: sci.med.nutrition
From: Larry Cashion <l...@midcoast.com.au>
Date: 1998/02/02
Subject: Re: Not healthy, but does it work?
1. You're in stasis. Your body thinks it's in starvation mode (under the
circumstances you describe, I suppose it really is) and won't let go of any calories unless it's for survival reasons. 2. You're probably carrying some excess fluid. If you're starving 3. Calories aren't calories. Some are easier/harder to digest and may Larry Cashion You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||
| Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy |
| ©2010 Google |